tinhorn

January 15, 2009 - 06:11 PM GMT

f you're going to step up to the plate and try to fill those inglorious shoes, you better bring something mighty rare to the party or sit back and collect your measly pittance from the first band you wrecked. I admire their wherewhithal to hit the road again, and most deals are made sans public discourse, so if you're going to tour again, make sure your homage is rightly placed. Most of these bands have inked indelible images on the minds of their listeners, and rarely, if ever is version 2.0 as good in the minds of devotees as the pivotal source. I would never pay 185 dollars to see a band build their retirement fund unless there was some Godly Harmonic Convergence of rock and roll royalty to stir the embryonic journey once again. I did like Robert Plant and Allison Krauss, that was some magic. Move on, and create something new instead of going for the Crapmaster tour of the Decade already. Aren't you artists, after all? where's the new inspiration coming from? Or are you all just shills to the management companies trying to Simon Cowell us into trying again? It will never be the same, just get some cats and an acoustic guitar and leave us o

• Flag

Leesa

January 11, 2009 - 09:14 AM GMT

I just want to say I have always loved INXS and I think JD Fortune is an extremely talented guy. I loved the show and thought they made the right choice.

• Flag

Leesa

January 11, 2009 - 09:09 AM GMT

• Flag

jennyquatro

December 25, 2008 - 09:08 PM GMT

Besides The Doors and INXS, all these bands sucked anyway. Sorry, JMO!

• Flag

Bart the Scion

November 30, 2008 - 10:16 AM GMT

How come they dont mention Ian Gillian from Deep Purple as Black Sabbaths front man?? Well maybe because he was actually really good. The Born Again cd was great.

• Flag

pjb

November 26, 2008 - 07:28 PM GMT

1) Arnel Pineda may be a good singer; but it's not just the pipes, it's the personality.
2) Ronnie James Dio was much better solo than he was as Ozzy's replacement. To that end, he wasn't a sufficient replacement for J.O. (Ozzy's real initials)
3) Peter Cetera actually did sing really nice rock songs earlier with Chicago; but consider some of the songs that Terry Kath sang were FAR more lounge-lizard-y than even Cetera's solo stuff (e.g., Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is?), so I think in that band's instance, it was just the evolution they all went through together.
4) My first point about personality? Goes for ALL of these bands, and Styx too.
It's not just, can this person sing, can they stand up and wear gaudy costumes and assume the same sort of temperament as the person they replace; it's also a matter of, can they bring the same sensibility about song creation to the band that the original person brought? And in everyone's case that has been mentioned so far (and I include Mr. Hagar in this), the answer is a resounding NO. Sammy was a great amalgamation of influences -- from Ronnie Montrose through Neal Schon to Eddie Van Halen and beyond -- but ultimately, he was far better at distilling to his own essence. As soon as he and Eddie teamed up, it was all too art-rock-y. Dave was a pain in the a$$, but he knew what Van Halen originally stood for: PARTY.

• Flag

Skully

November 26, 2008 - 02:14 PM GMT

Y'know, it depends on the band. I'd say VH didn't suffer sales setbacks with Sammy, but if Jimmy and John Paul seriously think they'll have success w/o Robert... just look back to the success (or lack thereof) of the Page/Plant experiment.
Pineda's working for Journey, Tommy Shaw was instrumental in the success of Styx... let 'em rock! But Paul Rogers just isn't a good fit for Queen. Point here: make sure it works.
One word in defense of Michael Sweet; he's the only thing worth watching or listening to on that "Boston" stage.
And including UB40 and Blind Melon in this discussion?? Shouldn't a band have more than one hit in order to qualify for a frontman controversy??
Peace!

• Flag

bobvilch

November 25, 2008 - 09:22 PM GMT

While all are mentioning Peter Cetera of Chicago (formerly CTA) as a great contributor to their fame, they are failing to mention one of the best guitarists of his time, Terry Kath. Chicago bought in different guitarists to try to replace him and always seemed to fail and never could get that same sound. Although he did not have the greatest voice, he sang and played guitar from his soul.

• Flag

onespider

November 25, 2008 - 08:13 PM GMT

Michael McDonald wrecked the Doobies, why do you think they don,t use them anymore, and where is he by the way? Saw the Doobies a couple of years ago and EVERYONE who I talked to there said "THANK GOD THEY DID NOT BRING MICHAEL McDONALD" Nobody, but NOBODY who grew up with the Doobies could actually enjoy them with Michael. And what the heck happened to Skunk Baxter????

• Flag

yeswolf

November 25, 2008 - 07:37 PM GMT

Ridiculous. Some of these guys did a good job, all things considered. Ian Astbury was very entertaining with the former Doors. And some of your facts are totally wrong. For example, the man in the YES photo you show is NOT Benoit David, the singer YES is touring with -- it is David Benoit, the jazz pianist -- a totally different person who has nothing to do with YES. And there was no mention whatsoever of producer Trevor Horn when he the lead singer of YES for 1980's DRAMA album and tour.

• Flag